is tramadol hydrochloride a controlled substance buy soma onlin online viagra prescriptions does methadone effect tramadol euphoria india viagra generic fioricet with pregnancy viagra online without prescription generic fioricet mia 110 buy buy online viagra viagra cheap herbal viagra viagra viagra

Sick Transit

Boundedly unpredictable

12/30/2005

The Fearsome History of the Canadian Military

by @ 2:26 pm. Filed under Humor

Via Yglesias, a bit of holiday weekend fluff from WaPo:

Canadian military strategists developed a plan to invade the United States in 1921 … The Canadian plan was developed by the country’s director of military operations and intelligence … “He had a total annual budget of $1,200,” said Rudmin, “so he himself would drive to the areas where they were going to invade and take pictures and pick up free maps at gas stations.”

In 1839, Americans from Maine confronted Canadians in a border dispute known as the Aroostook War.

“There were never any shots fired,” said Etzinger, the Canadian Embassy spokesman, “but I think an American cow was injured — and a Canadian pig.”

Mmm… injured Canadian bacon.

12/29/2005

Damned if you do, Sued if you don’t

by @ 1:19 pm. Filed under Humor

From WaPo’s year-end compilation of weird news:

In court papers filed in 1994 but which only this year drew public attention, lawyers zealously representing the Catholic Archdiocese of Portland, Ore., offered an unusual countercharge to a child-support claim against Father Arturo Uribe: that the mother herself was negligent because she had engaged in “unprotected intercourse.” The lawyers did not explain how this defense squares with Roman Catholic doctrine, which regards birth control as a sin.

(Link to the compilation via the Secular Blasphemer)

12/22/2005

On a Lighter Note

by @ 12:02 pm. Filed under Humor

Something to balance out the heavy-duty reading of the last post: What the Internet is really for (video, sound, not work-safe)

A Tortured History

by @ 11:59 am. Filed under Law & Politics

Via Sullivan, an unpleasant but very important column by Soviet dissident Vladimir Bukovsky:

So, why would democratically elected leaders of the United States ever want to legalize what a succession of Russian monarchs strove to abolish? Why run the risk of unleashing a fury that even Stalin had problems controlling? Why would anyone try to “improve intelligence-gathering capability” by destroying what was left of it? … [I]f Vice President Cheney is right and that some “cruel, inhumane or degrading” (CID) treatment of captives is a necessary tool for winning the war on terrorism, then the war is lost already.

12/20/2005

The Greatest G3N3R4T10N!!!

by @ 9:02 pm. Filed under Humor

This should join the true classics of ‘net humor: World War II - The Chat Log!

12/18/2005

Perilepse Anagnoste

by @ 1:39 pm. Filed under Humor

If you’ve ever wondered what made Ancient Greeks laugh, Orac links to one of the world’s oldest joke books:

When an intellectual was told by someone, “Your beard is now coming in,” he went to the rear-entrance and waited for it. Another intellectual asked what he was doing. Once he heard the whole story, he said: “I’m not surprised that people say we lack common sense. How do you know that it’s not coming in by the other gate?”

An intellectual during the night ravished his grandmother and for this got a beating from his father. He complained: “You’ve been mounting my mother for a long time, without suffering any consequences from me. And now you’re mad that you found me screwing your mother for the first time ever!”

A misogynist stood in the marketplace and announced: “I’m putting my wife up for sale, tax-free!” When people asked him why, he said: “So the authorities will impound her.”

Obviously, Henny Youngman was known as Hierocles in a past life.

I believe in fairies

by @ 1:16 pm. Filed under Law & Politics

Orin Kerr writes, re the Patriot Act renewal:

My hope is that the Bush Administration will agree to renegotiate some of the more controversial provisions, addressing some of the opponents’ concerns and reaching a compromise that reflects the current political landscape.

And my hope is that the garden gnomes outside my new apartment will dig up highly valuable buried treasure and deposit it on my doorstep.

But you’ve got to respect Orin for keeping the dream alive.

Condemnation, yes; sanctions, no

by @ 1:10 pm. Filed under Law & Politics

Via Secular Blasphemy, the EU is considering sanctions on Iran in response to Ahmadinejad’s recent anti-Semitic remarks, in particular his denial of the Holocaust:

EU leaders warned Tehran they will review the diplomatic options for possible sanctions because of Iran’s recent “provocative political moves.”

I think it’s a good thing that the EU condemned the remarks. Tolerance of anti-semitism in Europe has been sadly on the rise, but Holocaust denial seems to be where they draw the line, especially in countries that were under the Nazi regime. (Cf David Irving in Austria.)

Still, I hope that the talk of sanctions is just a way of making the scolding a little more emphatic. Actually imposing sanctions over speech–not conduct that causes harm to human rights or the international community, but just speech–is, as far as I am aware, unprecedented in international relations. It would also strongly and needlessly reinforce the image that many people in the Middle East already have, that the West is biased pro-Israel.

12/15/2005

Not Big Enough to Cover

by @ 12:50 am. Filed under A & E

Via Pandagon, a tale of British prudery:

A gallery has replaced a painting of a naked man with a female nude after it received dozens of complaints.

The Mark Jason Gallery, in Bell Street, Marylebone, removed the offending image by artist Edd Pearman after more than 30 men voiced their objection.

Some said the picture would upset women, others said it was pornographic.

You can see this upsetting, pornographic painting below the jump.
(more…)

12/12/2005

Oh Come, All Ye Philistine

by @ 11:04 pm. Filed under Law & Politics, Religion & Philosophy

One school district has drawn an interesting line in regard to holiday music:

It says that sacred music at school assemblies should be included for educational purposes, and that educational information about the music can be given in program notes or verbally. It continues: “Some selections, those in which the text particularly implies or encourages worship, would not be appropriate in school settings.” The memo gives “O Come, All Ye Faithful,” as an example. However, according to the memo, “Silent Night,” because it is “descriptive in nature and does not request a particular religious behavior,” would be acceptable if accompanied by educational text.

This is a pity, since “O Come, All Ye Faithful” is an immeasurably better song. My suggestion? Sing it in Latin. No one except for the honors club knows what “Adeste Fideles” means anyway, right?

Tales of Stupidity

by @ 8:48 pm. Filed under Sci & Tech

A couple of C|Net stories today had a common theme.

First story:

A former software executive’s guilty plea to charges of breaking into a rival’s computers and stealing trade secrets has offered a rare glimpse into the world of corporate espionage.

Second story:

A man in Nashville has admitted that, in trying to shock a colleague with a joke, he put false information into a Wikipedia entry about John Seigenthaler Sr. … Chase resigned from his job because, he said, he did not want to cause problems for his company.

The common thread? Both guys did their deeds using their own IP address… and a dedicated work IP, no less.

So as a Public Service Announcement, I just wanted to remind all my readers: if you’re going to do something felonious, or something that could get you fired, please mask your address!

12/10/2005

Does indoctrination work?

by @ 4:16 pm. Filed under A & E, Religion & Philosophy

Kevin Drum wonders:

Would a fantasy story like Narnia really make children more accepting of Christian theology when they encounter it in the future? That strikes me as nonsensical. After all, the whole point of the stories in the Bible is that they are actually true. Conversely, the whole point of Narnia is that it’s a fantasy. If children make any connection at all, wouldn’t the most likely connection be that Christ’s miracles sure seem an awful lot like Narnia’s magic, which we all know is just a made-up story?

Known fiction, however, can still help us to accept something as real. Newspaper stories about new technology, for example, often contain references to similar concepts in popular sci-fi. The Army even traded on this familiarity by naming its new non-lethal laser weapon “phaser”.

Fiction may not make us inherently more ready to believe that something exists in fact, but it does at least introduce the concept, which is an important prerequisite to belief. That is especially the case with Narnia, where I think that Lewis’ main concept is not so much the “facts” of miracles or resurrections, but rather the idea of atonement through sacrifice, especially through sacrificial death of the innocent.

I don’t know if reading Narnia actually makes kids more likely to accept this concept. But for children raised without instruction in Christian theology (which probably includes most nominal Christians), it at least gives them exposure to the concept, which was probably Lewis’ goal.

12/7/2005

The Little Creatures in Your Television

by @ 8:24 pm. Filed under Sci & Tech, Humor

Via Raymond Chen, the funniest blog post you will ever read about HDTV screen resolutions.

P.S. Read it even if you are not a techno-weenie. Trust me.

12/3/2005

Biting the Bullet

by @ 2:40 pm. Filed under General

Well it looks like, due to a bad regex that slipped into Spam Karma’s blacklist, legitimate users have been unable to comment on the site, unless they had a cookie. (Thanks to Brian for letting me know about the problem.) Conversely, the spammers have somehow managed to continue (obviously, they either obtained or forged the cookie), and I have several thousand new pieces of spam just in the week since I last cleaned out the database.

So until I upgrade my versions of WP and Spam Karma, comments are closed. If you have a burning need to reply to a post, or just want to say hi, e-mail me at dan at danielglick dot com.

For the Greater Good

by @ 2:06 pm. Filed under Abstractions

Via Tyler Cowen, an interesting side remark in a NYT article:

Brain-dead patients in France are presumed to be organ donors unless they have made explicit provisions to the contrary, and approval by next of kin is not normally required.

I feel like I should be more troubled by this than I am. After all, Western society has traditionally recognized a very deep personal interest in controlling the disposition of one’s body after one’s death. Here in the US, even if someone is a registered organ donor, their organs will not be used if their family objects.

And yet, all I can think about is the thousands of people who die from a lack of transplantable organs every year. And so at a gut level, the French approach seems right to me. But I’m open to being persuaded otherwise.

[powered by WordPress; 26 queries. 0.109 seconds ]

This is not the site of journalist and author Daniel Glick. His website is at danielglick.net

categories:

search blog:

archives:

December 2005
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Sick Transit: A directionless train of thought. Sic transit cogitationes Danis.

Links

Top Blogs

internal links:

other: